Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 11(2): e6859, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231950

RESUMEN

A 40-year-old man was admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Although most of multiple ground-glass opacities and consolidations on computed tomography improved, a round ground-glass opacity with consolidation remained unchanged and was suspected to be a part-solid nodule of lung adenocarcinoma. Pathologic diagnosis of resected tumor was papillary adenocarcinoma.

2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 22218, 2022 Dec 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2186030

RESUMEN

Perceived discrimination and work impairment are commonly observed in COVID-19 survivors, but their relationship has not been well understood. We aimed to evaluate the role of discrimination in the development of psychological distress and work impairment in COVID-19 survivors. From April 2020 to November 2021, 309 patients were recruited at two designated COVID-19 hospitals in Japan. Participants completed a standardized questionnaire including COVID-19 sequelae, psychological distress, impairments in work performance and perceived discrimination. The majority of participants (62.5%) experienced one or more COVID-19 sequelae. Psychological distress was observed in 36.9% and work impairment in 37.9%. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, COVID-19 sequelae and discrimination were associated with both psychological distress and work impairment. Mediation analysis demonstrated that the direct effect of sequelae on work impairment was non-significant after accounting for psychological distress, suggesting that the effect of sequelae on work impairment was mainly mediated through psychological distress. These findings were replicated in a subgroup analysis limited to patients with mild COVID-19. We conclude that discrimination plays an important role in the development of psychological distress and work impairment, and that both discrimination and psychological distress should be targets of intervention in COVID-19 survivors.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Distrés Psicológico , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Japón/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología
3.
Respir Investig ; 60(6): 772-778, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1996527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Omicron variant have not been fully described. Unlike other variants, the Omicron variant replicates rapidly in the bronchus. Therefore, we hypothesized that it would have different computed tomography (CT) findings from non-Omicron variants. METHODS: We enrolled patients with COVID-19 who visited our hospital and underwent chest CT during the first month of the Omicron wave (January 2022; N = 231) and the previous non-Omicron wave (July 2021; N = 87). We retrospectively evaluated the differences in the prevalence rate and CT characteristics of COVID-19 pneumonia between the two waves. RESULTS: The prevalence of pneumonia was significantly lower in the Omicron wave group (79/231, 34.2%) compared to the previous wave group (67/87, 77.0%) (P < 0.001). For the predominant distribution pattern of pneumonia, the Omicron wave group revealed a significantly lower rate of the peripheral pattern and a higher rate of the random pattern than the previous wave group. In addition, the Omicron wave group had a significantly lower rate of consolidation than the previous wave group. The ground-glass opacities (GGOs) rate was similar between the two wave groups. For GGOs patterns, cluster-like GGOs along the bronchi on chest CT were more frequently observed during the Omicron wave than during the previous wave. CONCLUSION: The Omicron wave group had a lower COVID-19 pneumonia prevalence than the previous wave group. Cluster-like GGOs should be noted as a characteristic CT finding of pneumonia during the Omicron wave.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(11): 1552-1557, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1936796

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The global rise of syphilis infections and the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are causes for concern. We herein report a rare case of concurrent primary syphilis and COVID-19. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old man was admitted with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Although COVID-19 pneumonia appeared during ciclesonide and favipiravir treatment, his symptoms improved without developing severe hypoxemia. A small, red ulcer on the left-side of his glans penis was noted and left inguinal lymph node swellings were detected on computed tomography (CT). He reported that his last engagement in sexual intercourse had been 3 months previously, and that his partner had subsequently been diagnosed with syphilis. Although both serum Treponema pallidum (TP) antibody and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) quantitative tests were negative on the day of admission, we clinically diagnosed a suspected case of primary syphilis and started treatment with amoxicillin (1500 mg/day). We subsequently learned that the TP antibody and RPR quantitative tests had been positive 4 days before starting syphilis treatment. Amoxicillin treatment was continued for 61 days, and the ulcer gradually improved. One year later, the RPR quantitative test was negative, and CT revealed a reduction in size of the inguinal lymph nodes and no residual signs of COVID-19 pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of syphilis has been increasing even during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the incidence of concurrent syphilis and COVID-19 might be higher than is recognized. Asking patients with COVID-19 about high-risk sexual behavior and genital lesions could help with early diagnosis of syphilis.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sífilis , Adulto , Amoxicilina , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Treponema pallidum , Úlcera
5.
Respir Investig ; 60(4): 578-584, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1931087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Casirivimab and imdevimab are effective in preventing hospitalization in outpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, disease progression after casirivimab and imdevimab administration has been reported. This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for disease progression after casirivimab and imdevimab administration. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with COVID-19 who received casirivimab and imdevimab at Hiroshima City Funairi Citizens Hospital between August 6, 2021, and October 10, 2021. All patients had at least one risk factor for severe disease and were treated on admission. The patients' background characteristics and test results at the first visit were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups (progressed and improved) based on whether they progressed to acute respiratory failure during hospitalization. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included: 9 patients in the progressed group (median age, 56 years) and 58 patients in the improved group (median age, 51 years). Age, coexistence rate of diabetes, cycle threshold value of polymerase chain reaction test, rate of detectable pneumonia on chest radiographs or chest computed tomography images, lymphocyte count, and the levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, glucose, and glycated hemoglobin were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the coexistence of diabetes and the presence of detectable pneumonia on chest radiographs were independent factors predicting the progression to acute respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: Acute respiratory failure after antibody therapy with casirivimab and imdevimab may develop in patients with diabetes or detectable pneumonia on chest radiographs at the first visit.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(5): e05684, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819340

RESUMEN

The Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide since December 2021. In daily medical practice, pneumonia does not often appear as a complication of the Omicron variant. We present a case of COVID-19 pneumonia by the Omicron variant in young patients without obvious risk factors.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA